Skip to main content
Research PolicyVolume 39, Issue 3, April 2010, Pages 375-385

Brokerage in SME networks(Article)

  Save all to author list
  • aFontys University of Applied Science, P.O. Box 347, 5600 AH Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • bEindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands

Abstract

This study focuses on SME networks of design and high-tech companies in Southeast Netherlands. By highlighting the personal networks of members across design and high-tech industries, the study attempts to identify the main brokers in this dynamic environment. In addition, we investigate whether specific characteristics are associated with these brokers. The main contribution of the paper lies in the fact that, in contrast to most other work, it is of a quantitative nature and focuses on brokers identified in an actual network. Studying the phenomenon of brokerage provides us with clear insights into the concept of brokerage regarding SME networks in different fields. In particular we highlight how third parties contribute to the transfer and development of knowledge. Empirical results show, among others, that the most influential brokers are found in the non-profit and science sector and have a long track record in their branch. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author keywords

Creative industriesInnovationIntermediariesNetworksStrategic alliances

Indexed keywords

Engineering uncontrolled termsCreative industriesDynamic environmentsEmpirical resultsHigh tech companiesHigh-tech industriesNetherlandsNon-profitPersonal networksStrategic allianceThird partiesTrack record
Engineering main heading:Profitability
  • ISSN: 00487333
  • CODEN: REPYB
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.005
  • Document Type: Article

  Kirkels, Y.; Fontys University of Applied Science, P.O. Box 347, Netherlands;
© Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 116 documents

Clausen, L.P.W. , Nielsen, M.B. , Hansen, S.F.
Who are engaging in the nano-specific partner expert groups? An analysis of partner expert groups vs. expert groups
(2021) Environmental Sciences Europe
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. , Nätti, S. , Pikkarainen, M.
Orchestrating for lead user involvement in innovation networks
(2021) Technovation
Dharmani, P. , Das, S. , Prashar, S.
A bibliometric analysis of creative industries: Current trends and future directions
(2021) Journal of Business Research
View details of all 116 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Reproductive Rights; Eugenics; Family Planning","id":48146,"uri":"Topic/48146","prominencePercentile":34.744217,"prominencePercentileString":"34.744","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"403cd8aa13b3f42b1d91748477ea4ef3531ce388e576a18e1c520d924e91ec03"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: