Skip to main content
Journal of Productivity AnalysisVolume 35, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages 263-269

A note on testing for complementarity and substitutability in the case of multiple practices(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aDepartment of Organization and Strategy, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
  • bKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Recent empirical studies of firm-level performance have tested complementarity in the case of multiple practices. These papers have drawn conclusions using potentially biased estimates of pair-wise interaction effects. We develop a consistent and simple testing framework and test it against alternatives. © 2010 The Author(s).

Author keywords

ComplementarityFirm performanceSupermodularity
  • ISSN: 0895562X
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11123-010-0189-8
  • Document Type: Article

  Carree, M.; Department of Organization and Strategy, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Netherlands;
© Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 36 documents

Albis, N. , Álvarez, I. , García, A.
The impact of external, internal, and dual relational embeddedness on the innovation performance of foreign subsidiaries: Evidence from a developing country
(2021) Journal of International Management
Choo, A. , Narayanan, S. , Srinivasan, R.
Introducing goods innovation, service innovation, or both? Investigating the tension in managing innovation revenue streams for manufacturing and service firms
(2021) Journal of Operations Management
Kim, T.H. , Choi, B. , Lee, J.-N.
Portfolio effects of knowledge management strategies on firm performance: Complementarity or substitutability?
(2021) Information and Management
View details of all 36 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Community Innovation Survey; Marketing Innovation; Manufacturing Firms","id":23243,"uri":"Topic/23243","prominencePercentile":93.71045,"prominencePercentileString":"93.710","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"f40ffb201b1570d96e220136cec0952feb62017fb32523ec90b3b7029f8c573d"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: