Skip to main content
Ecological EconomicsVolume 72, 15 December 2011, Pages 28-36

The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments - A typical case of the blind men and the elephant?(Short Survey)

  Save all to author list
  • aICIS, Maastricht University and UNU-MERIT, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • bEuropean Research Council (ERC), European Commission COV2, BE-1049 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

In this paper we examine the innovation effects of environmental policy instruments in four literatures: theoretical models on incentives for eco-innovation, econometric studies based on observed data, survey analysis based on stated information and technology case studies. The aim of this paper is to critically examine the methods and the results. We argue that the case studies literature, even when its results are specific and difficult to generalise, is a necessary source of empirical evidence about policy impacts and the factors responsible for these impacts, pointing to issues that are neglected in the theoretical and econometric literature such as the specifics of the innovation context and policy interaction effects. The paper states five synthesised findings and makes a plea for multi-method analysis. One other important synthesised finding is that the influence of market-based instruments on innovation (such as emission trading and taxes) is far weaker than assumed. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

Author keywords

Environmental policy instrumentsInnovationResearch methodology

Indexed keywords

GEOBASE Subject Index:emissions tradingempirical analysisenvironmental economicsenvironmental policyenvironmental taxinnovationresearch work
  • ISSN: 09218009
  • CODEN: ECECE
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
  • Document Type: Short Survey

  Kemp, R.; ICIS, Maastricht University and UNU-MERIT, P.O. Box 616, Netherlands;
© Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 216 documents

Vermeulen, R. , Schets, E. , Lohuis, M.
The heat is on: A framework for measuring financial stress under disruptive energy transition scenarios
(2021) Ecological Economics
Li, K. , Yan, Y. , Zhang, X.
Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China
(2021) Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Kim, Y.
Technological innovation, the kyoto protocol, and open innovation
(2021) Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
View details of all 216 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Eco-Innovation; Porter Hypothesis; Environmental Innovation","id":12299,"uri":"Topic/12299","prominencePercentile":99.18266,"prominencePercentileString":"99.183","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"8c5f88b5dccb783bb45146d280bdc685ec2317b8547a183486295ac34061af99"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: