Skip to main content
Journal of Medical ScreeningVolume 19, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 83-88

The impact of media coverage of the Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial on English colorectal screening uptake(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aCancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • bBowel Cancer Screening Programme, Southern Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital, United Kingdom
  • cBowel Cancer Screening Programme, Southern Hub, University of Surrey and Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of media coverage of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial on colorectal screening uptake in England. Setting: In April 2010, publication of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Trial results generated considerable media interest in both FS and colorectal cancer (CRC) generally. Methods: We used routinely collected data from the south of England (excluding London) to analyse return of faecal occult blood test (FOBt) kits within 28 days of the invitation (early uptake) among 60-69 year olds, before (T1, n = 31,229), around the time of (T2, n = 39,571), and one month after (T3, n = 33,430) the FS publicity. Results: FOBt uptake over the whole period was 58.2%, with 38.4% of the kits returned within 28 days (early uptake). Across the three time periods, early uptake was 35.8% at T1, 39.4% at T2, and 39.7% at T3. Multivariate regression controlling for age, gender and socioeconomic status confirmed that uptake was higher if people received the FOBt kit around the time of the media coverage (T2: odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.13-1.20), or one month after (T3: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.15-1.22) than before (T1). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that the impact was stronger among previous non-responders than among first-time invitees or previous responders (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Media coverage of the FS Trial appeared to have a small but positive impact on FOBt screening uptake, especially among people who had previously abstained from screening.

Indexed keywords

EMTREE medical terms:agedarticlecolorectal tumorhumanmass mediummass screeningmiddle agedsigmoidoscopyUnited Kingdomutilization review
MeSH:AgedColorectal NeoplasmsEnglandHumansMass MediaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSigmoidoscopy
  • ISSN: 09691413
  • CODEN: JMSCF
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1258/jms.2012.012017
  • PubMed ID: 22653573
  • Document Type: Article

  Von Wagner, C.; Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, United Kingdom;
© Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 7 documents

Zelenyanszki, C. , McAvinchey, R. , Hudson, S.
The National Patient Notification Exercise: How well did local breast screening services cope with the additional workload?
(2020) Journal of Medical Screening
Ghanouni, A. , Von Wagner, C. , Waller, J.
Public awareness of and responses to media coverage of invitation errors in the Breast Screening Programme in England: A cross-sectional population survey
(2019) BMJ Open
Honein-AbouHaidar, G.N. , Kastner, M. , Vuong, V.
Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening
(2016) Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
View details of all 7 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Early Detection of Cancer; Occult Blood; Colonoscopy","id":3169,"uri":"Topic/3169","prominencePercentile":97.13931,"prominencePercentileString":"97.139","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"3c2226e853d0903b5f6ff0e17dd4ff947608c12953b2bc0560699ef157675544"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: