

Many former refugees in Africa that return to their country of origin face challenges of (re-)gaining access to land and other assets that are a necessity for building sustainable livelihoods. A policy approach that has often been adopted to solve landlessness for returnees is the concept of villagisation. This article provides an in-depth analysis of Burundi's Rural Integrated Villages project, which has recently been implemented as an emergency approach to accommodate landless 1972 caseload refugees and other vulnerable populations. By comparing the Rural Integrated Villages project to other villagisation policies in Africa, and the Imidugudu policy that was implemented in Rwanda in the 1990s in particular, this article demonstrates that to date no villagisation policy has been successful in providing long-term, sustainable solutions for landless returnee populations. A successful implementation model for return villages is lacking and long-term evaluations on return villages are scarce, which hampers institutional learning. The article concludes by exploring alternatives to villagisation for returnees and presenting lessons learned for future cases of refugee return. © Author(s) [2014].All rights reserved.
| GEOBASE Subject Index: | conceptual frameworkhuman settlementimmigration policypolicy approachpolicy implementationrefugeevillage |
|---|---|
| Regional Index: | BurundiRwanda |
| Funding sponsor | Funding number | Acronym |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission See opportunities by EC | EC | |
| Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken | ||
| Danish International Development Agency | DANIDA |
The inter-agency approach has led to coordination problems with respect to service provision in the VRIs. This is mainly a result of differences in donor support and budget allocation by the different actors. UNHCRs work on the VRIs is financially supported by DANIDA, while the European Commission is the largest
* Sonja Fransen and Katie Kuschminder are PhD Fellows at Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University. The authors would like to thank UNHCRs Policy Development and Evaluation Service (PDES) for providing a research grant to conduct the research on which this study was based. The authors are also grateful to ZOA refugee care Burundi, who provided logistical support for this research, and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs for funding the Migration and Development: A World in Motion project that enabled the authors to gain previous research experience in Burundi.
Kuschminder, K.; Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, Netherlands
© Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.