Skip to main content
International Journal of BiotechnologyVolume 13, Issue 1-3, 2014, Pages 90-104

Bionetworks vs. nanonetworks: A comparison of diffusion rates of emerging technologies(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aWilliams School of Business, Bishop's University, 2600 College Street, Lennoxville, QC J1M 1Z7, Canada
  • bUNU-MERIT, Keizer Karelplein 19, 6211 TC Maastricht, Netherlands

Abstract

This exploratory investigation offers evidence from biotechnology and nanotechnology sectors regarding the differential impacts of information flow rates, dispersion of networks and combination of progenitor sciences and technologies on technology diffusion rates. In recent years, enhanced rates of information flow have increased the ability for a greater overall number and diversity of foreign players to enter emerging technology development trajectories. At the same time, these trends are creating more dispersed networks with concomitant problems associated with information flow in such diffuse situations. Rates of diffusion of emerging technologies are also importantly affected by the number of scientific fields and generic technologies combined to create the new technology and the level of resultant complexity; higher levels of complexity can slow down diffusion rates. Further, at the country level, absorptive capacity is largely determined through institutions and their policies; however, in terms of enabling diffusion of technology to move effectively downstream from science to market, this requires social capabilities. © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Author keywords

BiotechnologyDiffusion of technologyNanotechnologyNational systems of innovationNetworks

Indexed keywords

Engineering controlled terms:BiotechnologyComplex networksMergers and acquisitionsNanotechnologyNetworks (circuits)
Engineering uncontrolled termsAbsorptive capacityDiffusion of TechnologyEmerging technologiesGeneric technologyInformation flowsNational systems of innovationsScientific fieldsTechnology diffusion
Engineering main heading:Diffusion
EMTREE drug terms:nanomaterialrecombinant DNA
GEOBASE Subject Index:biotechnologyinformation and communication technologyinnovationnanotechnologynetwork analysisscience and technologytechnological developmenttechnology adoptiontechnology diffusiontrend analysis
EMTREE medical terms:absorptionarticlebiotechnologycontrolled studydiffusiondispersiondrug designflow ratehumanhypothesisinformation processingmarketnanotechnologypatentprocess developmentsciencescientistsocial capital
  • ISSN: 09636048
  • CODEN: IJBNB
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1504/IJBT.2014.059649
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Inderscience Publishers

  Reid, S.E.; Williams School of Business, Bishop's University, 2600 College Street, Canada;
© Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 1 document

Marra, A. , Antonelli, P. , Pozzi, C.
Biotech specialisations and metropolitan clusters in San Diego, CA, and Cambridge, MA - A network analysis using metadata
(2017) International Journal of Biotechnology
View details of this citation
{"topic":{"name":"Financial Institutions; Simplification; Silos","id":90067,"uri":"Topic/90067","prominencePercentile":2.2403853,"prominencePercentileString":"2.240","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"660424f461d8dd4c458195d7069fd050859bd181f78586a0d24a7cd31572f562"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: