Skip to main content
Research PolicyVolume 43, Issue 5, June 2014, Pages 841-852

Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aKU Leuven, Belgium
  • bUNU-MERIT and Maastricht University, Netherlands
  • cIESE Business School, Spain
  • dCEPR, United Kingdom
  • eUniversity of Groningen, Netherlands
  • fVlerick Business School, Belgium
  • gFWO Flanders, Belgium
  • hIGS, University of Twente, Netherlands

Abstract

Combining both interview data and empirical analyses at the patent and firm levels, we explore the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of R&D collaboration resulting in the co-ownership of intellectual property (i.e. co-patents). We make an explicit distinction between three different types of co-patenting partners: intra-industry partners, inter-industry partners, and universities. Our findings indicate that the value-appropriation challenges of IP sharing are clearly evident with intra-industry co-patenting, where partners are more likely to encounter overlapping exploitation domains. Co-patenting with universities is associated with higher market value, since appropriation challenges are unlikely to play a role and collaboration may signal novel technological opportunities. Although we find some evidence that co-patenting corresponds to higher (patent) value, patents co-owned with firms are significantly less likely to receive self-citations, indicating constraints on the future exploitation and development of co-owned technologies. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Author keywords

Co-ownershipCo-patentingIntellectual propertyOpen innovationValue appropriationValue creation

Indexed keywords

Engineering controlled terms:IndustryIntellectual property
Engineering uncontrolled termsCo-ownershipCo-patentingOpen innovationValue appropriationValue creation
Engineering main heading:Patents and inventions

Funding details

Funding sponsor Funding number Acronym
ECO2012-38134
Generalitat de Catalunya2009-SGR919,IMPH006
Fonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekG.0468.09FWO
  • 1

    The authors wish to thank Henry Chesbrough, Ashish Arora, the two anonymous referees, John Hagedoorn, Ammon Salter, and the participants in the workshop on Open Innovation: New Insights and Evidence held in London and the DRUID conference in Barcelona for their helpful comments. In addition, we would like to thank Esther van Zimmeren (CIR, KU Leuven) for providing feedback on the legal implications of (co-) patents and various company experts for sharing their experience and insights on co-patenting strategies and their implications. Bruno Cassiman is a research fellow of the SP-SP Research Center at IESE Business School and acknowledges partial financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competition through project n° ECO2012-38134, the Catalan Government Grant n° 2009-SGR919 . Bruno Cassiman and Bart Van Looy acknowledge partial financial support from IMPH006 and Bart Leten and Rene Belderbos from FWO Flanders (project G.0468.09).

  • ISSN: 00487333
  • CODEN: REPYB
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Elsevier B.V.

  Cassiman, B.; KU Leuven, Belgium;
© Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 141 documents

van Burg, E. , Du, J. , Kers, J.G.
When do academics patent outside their university? An in-depth case study
(2021) Technovation
Torrecilla-García, J.A. , Pardo-Ferreira, M.D.C. , Rubio-Romero, J.C.
Assessment of research, development and innovation in occupational health and safety in Spain
(2021) Safety Science
Belderbos, R. , Park, J. , Carree, M.
Do R&D investments in weak IPR countries destroy market value? The role of internal linkages
(2021) Strategic Management Journal
View details of all 141 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Patent Holder; Patenting; Intellectual Property Rights","id":3682,"uri":"Topic/3682","prominencePercentile":95.72565,"prominencePercentileString":"95.726","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"39ab83b5d872c6a17e9a35efc8f1952446bfc5974b45d599d8cfd2fa375747ca"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: