

We describe a significant practical consequence of taking anthropic biases into account in deriving predictions for rare stochastic catastrophic events. The risks associated with catastrophes such as asteroidal/cometary impacts, supervolcanic episodes, and explosions of supernovae/gamma-ray bursts are based on their observed frequencies. As a result, the frequencies of catastrophes that destroy or are otherwise incompatible with the existence of observers are systematically underestimated. We describe the consequences of this anthropic bias for estimation of catastrophic risks, and suggest some directions for future work. © 2010 Society for Risk Analysis.
| Engineering uncontrolled terms | Anthropic principleExistential risksGlobal catastrophesImpact hazardNatural hazardSelection effects |
|---|---|
| Engineering controlled terms: | DisastersHazardsPhase transitionsRisk analysisRisk managementVacuum |
| Engineering main heading: | Risk perception |
| GEOBASE Subject Index: | catastrophic eventfuture prospectnatural hazardphase transitionrisk assessment |
| EMTREE medical terms: | accidentanimalanthropometryarticlecatastrophizingconfidence intervalexistentialismgreenhouse effecthumanobserver variationprobabilitypsychological aspectrisk assessmentspecies extinctionsurvival ratetheoretical model |
| MeSH: | AccidentsAnimalsAnthropometryCatastrophizationConfidence IntervalsExistentialismExtinction, BiologicalGlobal WarmingHumansModels, TheoreticalObserver VariationProbabilityRisk AssessmentSurvival Rate |
Ćirković, M.M.; Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, Volgina 7, Serbia;
© Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
© MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.