Skip to main content
Journal of Cleaner ProductionVolume 167, 20 November 2017, Pages 610-618

Comparative exergy-based life cycle assessment of conventional and hybrid base transmitter stations(Article)

  Save all to author list
  • aFaculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
  • bFaculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstract

Within a mobile communication network one can discern between base and hybrid base transmitter stations (BTS). The hybrid base transmitter stations differ from the conventional ones in that they use some alternative energy sources for power. This work presents a comparative assessment of life cycles of solar-powered hybrid BTS, and conventional BTS, using CML-IA method and CExD-based exergy analysis. Complete analysis was conducted, presenting the results of life cycle analysis for both systems. The results of assessment are presented using CML-IA and CExD categories at the mid-point level. The results also reveal a detailed insight into the mechanism of evolvement and sources of negative impact during life cycles of the analyzed systems. This establishes the basis for the development and manufacture of sustainable products and processes. Considering majority of factors, the use of hybrid BTS is justified. The exceptions are the categories of abiotic depletion, ozone layer depletion, and acidification according to CML-IA method, as well as the categories of non-renewable, primary and non-renewable minerals according to CExD method, which indicates greater negative impact in comparison with the conventional BTS. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd

Author keywords

Comparative analysisExergyHybrid base transmitter stationLife cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

Engineering controlled terms:ExergyOzone layerSolar energyTransmitters
Engineering uncontrolled termsAlternative energy sourceComparative analysisComparative assessmentHybrid base transmitter stationLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)Mobile communication networksOzone layer depletionSustainable products
Engineering main heading:Life cycle
  • ISSN: 09596526
  • CODEN: JCROE
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.176
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

  Budak, I.; Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
© Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 12 documents

Qiang, Z. , Nan, Q. , Chi, W.
Recycling packaging waste from residual waste reduces greenhouse gas emissions
(2024) Journal of Environmental Management
Hamidinasab, B. , Javadikia, H. , Hosseini-Fashami, F.
Illuminating sustainability: A comprehensive review of the environmental life cycle and exergetic impacts of solar systems on the agri-food sector
(2023) Solar Energy
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. , Rafiee, S. , Mohammadkashi, N.
Principle of Life Cycle Assessment and Cumulative Exergy Demand for Biodiesel Production: Farm-To-Combustion Approach
(2022) Green Energy and Technology
View details of all 12 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Exergy; Energy Efficiency; Life Cycle Assessment","id":7859,"uri":"Topic/7859","prominencePercentile":90.59047,"prominencePercentileString":"90.590","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"db2953d20f530b0a1ad3cbe4ca31e049a4603f5ba8622e080d534cf06a6cf33f"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: