Skip to main content
FuturesVolume 143, October 2022, Article number 103023

The nutshell kings: Why is human space settlement controversial in the first place?(Review)(Open Access)

  • Ćirković, M.M.
  Save all to author list
  • Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, Volgina 7, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia

Abstract

Recent years have seen both a revival of space programs, mostly propelled by private industry's increasing interest, but also the emergence of strong resistance to human space activities on several levels. This is partly a manifestation of a wider counter-Enlightenment Zeitgeist, as detectable in other sectors of public life in the West, and partly a reaction against the widespread engagement of the private sector. While it still does not dominate the discourse on space issues, space skepticism is surprisingly wide-ranging and decentralized phenomenon, gathering together heterogeneous strands of thought from pro-Enlightenment liberals to rabid “deep ecology” activists to philosophical pessimists to antiglobalists of all colors. There has been precious little in way of actively opposing this cultural trend so far, however. While space engineers and entrepreneurs conduct their “business as usual”, there are plethora of risks hidden in this cultural climate, esp. if one adopts much repeated (and rarely adequately understood) maxim that “politics is downstream of culture”. The present article will review major strands of thought within this “big tent” cultural movement, offer plausible counter-arguments to space skeptics, and outline important cultural and public-outreach work which needs to be done to balance the scales. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Indexed keywords

GEOBASE Subject Index:human activityhuman settlementprivate sector

Funding details

  • 1

    Three anonymous referees have kindly supplied useful comments resulting in significant improvement upon an early version of this manuscript. Pleasant discussions with Milica Banović, Keith Mansfield, Slobodan Popović, Srdja Janković, Mark Walker, Paul Gilster, Bojan Stojanović, Slobodan Perović, and Claire Berlinski are also hereby acknowledged.

  • ISSN: 00163287
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2022.103023
  • Document Type: Review
  • Publisher: Elsevier Ltd


© Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 3 documents

Balbi, A. , Lingam, M.
Waste Heat and Habitability: Constraints from Technological Energy Consumption
(2025) Astrobiology
Ćirković, M.M.
Ballet not for everyone: A reply to Szocik
(2023) Futures
Szocik, K.
Space not for everyone: The problem of social exclusion in the concept of space settlement
(2023) Futures
View details of all 3 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Space Exploration; Exobiology; Planetary Protection","id":28487,"uri":"Topic/28487","prominencePercentile":66.243835,"prominencePercentileString":"66.244","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"933b5d3ae587c397270810780c4e4e23d3a0fd5df47024786c913b4207f9b146"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: