Skip to main content
Tehnicki VjesnikVolume 30, Issue 1, 2023, Pages 32-38

The Analysis of Metrological Characteristics of Different Coordinate Measuring Systems(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aUniversity of Banja Luka, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Stepe Stepanović 71, Banja Luka, 78000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • bTechnical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Letná 9, Košice, 040 02, Slovakia
  • cThe School of Higher Technical Professional Education, Školska 1, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
  • dUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the metrological characteristics of some of the most commonly used coordinate measurement systems in industry in a case study of the flatness error. The accuracy and measurement uncertainty of the coordinate measuring machine with contact probe, point by point mode and scanning mode, and with non-contact probe, then performance measuring arm, optical scanner and finally industrial computed tomography were analyzed. In order to exclude factors that affect the accuracy of measurement and measurement uncertainty, and are not part of the hardware structure of the CMS, the experiment was conducted on a reference workpiece and an independent software solution was used to estimate the error of flatness. The accuracy of measuring systems was determined as the difference between the reference value and the mean value of repeated measurements and the measurement uncertainty was determined according to the instructions for estimating the measurement uncertainty GUM. The results of the research showed high metrological performance of the coordinate measuring machine and the optical scanner for this measuring task. Also, it was found that industrial computed tomography gives a very large measurement error and that the measurement uncertainty is very difficult to determine. © 2023, Strojarski Facultet. All rights reserved.

Author keywords

accuracycoordinate measurement systemsflatness error measurement uncertainty

Indexed keywords

Engineering controlled terms:Computerized tomographyLaser recordingMeasurement errorsProbesUncertainty analysis
Engineering uncontrolled termsAccuracyCoordinate measurement systemsCoordinate measuring systemsError measurementsFlatness errorFlatness error measurement uncertaintyIndustrial computed tomographyMeasurement uncertaintyMetrological characteristicsOptical scanners
Engineering main heading:Coordinate measuring machines

Funding details

Funding sponsor Funding number Acronym
Kultúrna a Edukacná Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR016TUKE-4/2021,021TUKE-4/2022,APVV-15-0149KEGA
  • 1

    This work is a part of these projects VEGA 1/0168/21, KEGA 016TUKE-4/2021, 021TUKE-4/2022 and APVV-15-0149.

  • ISSN: 13303651
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.17559/TV-20220204091212
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Strojarski Facultet

  Štrbac, B.; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, Novi Sad, Serbia;
© Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 5 documents

Štrbac, B. , Ranisavljev, M. , Orošnjak, M.
Unsupervised machine learning application in the selection of measurement strategy on Coordinate Measuring Machine
(2024) Advances in Production Engineering and Management
Acko, B. , Tompa, J. , Klobucar, R.
EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY CONTRIBUTIONS IN RING GAUGE CALIBRATION
(2024) International Journal of Simulation Modelling
Madić, M. , Girdu, C.C. , Marinković, D.
Analysis of Kerf Width and its Variation in CO2 Laser Cutting of Straight and Curved Cut Profiles
(2024) Tehnicki Vjesnik
View details of all 5 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Tomography; Additive Manufacturing; Metrology","id":25795,"uri":"Topic/25795","prominencePercentile":79.231476,"prominencePercentileString":"79.231","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"a5085b2b9be301485a826846a09f61d3ba953502763129a7d013aef96e37c9ef"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: