Skip to main content
MembranesVolume 13, Issue 3, March 2023, Article number 334

New Insights into the Fouling of a Membrane during the Ultrafiltration of Complex Organic–Inorganic Feed Water(Article)(Open Access)

  Save all to author list
  • aFaculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia
  • bFaculty of Technical Sciences Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the fouling of a ceramic membrane by a mixture containing high concentrations of humic acid and colloidal silica during cross-flow ultrafiltration under various operating conditions. Two types of feed water were tested: feed water containing humic acid and feed water containing a mixture of humic acid and colloidal silica. The colloidal silica exacerbated the fouling, yielding lower fluxes (109–394 L m−2 h−1) compared to the humic acid feed water (205–850 L m−2 h−1), while the retentions were higher except for the highest cross-flow rate. For the humic acid feed water, the irreversible resistance prevails under the cross-flow rate of 5 L min−1. During the filtration of an organic–inorganic mixture, the reversible resistance due to the formation of a colloidal cake layer prevails under all operating conditions with an exception. The exception is the filtration of the organic–inorganic mixture of a 50 mg L−1 humic acid concentration which resulted in a lower flux than the one of a 150 mg L−1 humic acid concentration under 150 kPa and a cross-flow rate of 5 L min−1. Here, the irreversible fouling is unexpectedly overcome. This is unusual and occurs due to the low agglomeration at low concentrations of humic acid under a high cross-flow rate. Under lower transmembrane pressure and a moderate cross-flow rate, fouling can be mitigated, and relatively high fluxes are yielded with high retentions even in the presence of nanoparticles. In this way, colloidal silica influences the minimization of membrane fouling by organic humic acid contributing to the control of in-pore organic fouling. © 2023 by the authors.

Author keywords

colloidal silicafoulinghumic acidmembrane fouling resistanceultrafiltrationwastewater

Indexed keywords

Engineering controlled terms:BoilersFlow rateMembrane foulingOrganic acidsSilicaSolsWater
Engineering uncontrolled termsColloidal silicaCross flowsFeed waterFouling resistanceHumic acidInorganic mixturesLow fluxMembrane fouling resistanceOperating conditionOrganic/inorganic
Engineering main heading:Ultrafiltration

Funding details

Funding sponsor Funding number Acronym
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja200134,451-03-47/2023-01/200134MPNTR
  • 1

    This work was financially supported by The Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, project no. 451-03-47/2023-01/200134.

  • ISSN: 20770375
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.3390/membranes13030334
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: MDPI

  Lukić, N.; Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, Serbia;
  Popović, S.; Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, Serbia;
© Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 3 documents

Almeria Ragio, R. , Lemos, H.G. , Nunes Leocadio, G.
Performance comparison of modified polyethersulfone membrane with graphene oxide and molybdenum disulfide for effective filtration of urban surface water
(2025) Separation and Purification Technology
Benyahia, K. , Khiari, M. , Berrabah, M.
Reuse of reverse osmosis membranes for wastewater treatment (Beni Saf Water Company)
(2024) Membrane and Water Treatment
Jamoussi, B. , Al-Sharif, M.N.M. , Gzara, L.
Hybrid Zinc Phthalocyanine/PVDF-HFP System for Reducing Biofouling in Water Desalination: DFT Theoretical and MolDock Investigations
(2024) Polymers
View details of all 3 citations
{"topic":{"name":"Ultrafiltration; Membrane Fouling; Water Purification","id":5386,"uri":"Topic/5386","prominencePercentile":98.15145,"prominencePercentileString":"98.151","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"8ff314491cc00f859a2afbc8b6d79496324b82a082124d5fb3c6c12f7bab7516"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: