Skip to main content
Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVolume 6, 2024, Article number 1394739

Comparison of vertical jump and sprint performances between 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 elite professional male basketball players(Article)(Open Access)

  • Cabarkapa, D.,
  • Johnson, Q.R.,
  • Aleksic, J.,
  • Cabarkapa, D.V.,
  • Philipp, N.M.,
  • Sekulic, M.,
  • Krsman, D.,
  • Trunic, N.,
  • Fry, A.C.
  • View Correspondence (jump link)
  Save all to author list
  • aJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory—Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States
  • bFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • cBesiktas Basketball Club, Istanbul, Turkey
  • dInternational Strength and Conditioning Institute, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • eFaculty of Physical Education and Sports Management, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Given its fast-growing popularity and unique on-court competitive demands, 3 × 3 basketball has captured a considerable amount of attention over recent years. However, unlike research focused on studying 5 × 5 basketball players, there is a lack of scientific literature focused on examining countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) and sprint performance characteristics of 3 × 3 athletes. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare force-time metrics during both eccentric and concentric phases of the CMJ and acceleration and deceleration capabilities between 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 top-tier professional male basketball athletes. Ten 3 × 3 and eleven 5 × 5 professional basketball players volunteered to participate in the present study. Upon completion of a standardized warm-up, each athlete performed three maximum-effort CMJs, followed by two 10 m sprints. A uni-axial force plate system sampling at 1,000 Hz was used to analyze CMJ force-time metrics and a radar gun sampling at 47 Hz was used to derive sprint acceleration-deceleration measures. Independent t-tests and Hedge's g were used to examine between-group statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) and effect size magnitudes. The findings of the present study reveal that 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 professional male basketball players tend to display similar neuromuscular performance characteristics as no significant differences were observed in any force-time metric during both eccentric and concentric phases of the CMJ (g = 0.061–0.468). Yet, prominent differences were found in multiple measures of sprint performance, with large effect size magnitudes (g = 1.221–1.881). Specifically, 5 × 5 basketball players displayed greater average and maximal deceleration and faster time-to-stop than their 3 × 3 counterparts. Overall, these findings provide reference values that sports practitioners can use when assessing athletes' CMJ and sprint performance capabilities as well as when developing sport-specific training regimens to mimic on-court competitive demands. 2024 Cabarkapa, Johnson, Aleksic, Cabarkapa, Philipp, Sekulic, Krsman, Trunic and Fry.

Author keywords

accelerationconcentricdecelerationeccentricforcemonitoringpowersport
  • ISSN: 26249367
  • Source Type: Journal
  • Original language: English
  • DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1394739
  • Document Type: Article
  • Publisher: Frontiers Media SA

  Cabarkapa, D.; Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory—Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States;
© Copyright 2024 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Cited by 1 document

Cabarkapa, D. , Aleksic, J. , Krsman, D.
The impact of simulated 3x3 tournament on vertical jump force-time metrics in national team male basketball players
(2024) Frontiers in Physiology
View details of this citation
{"topic":{"name":"Body Composition; Anthropometry; Fitness","id":40162,"uri":"Topic/40162","prominencePercentile":85.84268,"prominencePercentileString":"85.843","overallScholarlyOutput":0},"dig":"5ee4afcf9d713d683994f898bcb38a909817d2393f16e7a26a05a9de7996322b"}

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:
Prominence percentile: